European Data Privacy Enforcement

Enforce Your
Data Rights.
Make Spammers Pay.

Unsolicited B2B cold emails are unlawful processing of personal data under the General Data Protection Regulation. SpamBounty is the legal pipeline that turns that breach into a recoverable claim under Articles 15 and 82 GDPR. Under a Polish-law cesja assignment, the claim is consolidated at Block Ventures Sp. z o.o., so your name never appears on a demand letter or a public docket.

GDPR Art. 15
Right of access by the data subject
GDPR Art. 82
Right to compensation and liability
Cesja, Polish Civil Code Art. 509
Assignment of claims for collective enforcement
Status: Operational
Live complaints routed to UODO · 27 Member States.
Docket · SB-2026-IV

II.·The Infringement

Every unsolicited email is a documented breach.

The average business professional with a publicly listed email address receives between forty and one hundred twenty unsolicited commercial messages per working week. Each of these emails is sent to an address that identifies a natural person, and each one counts as processing of personal data under Article 4(1) GDPR.

Under Article 6 GDPR, any processing of personal data needs a lawful basis. A cold commercial email with no prior contract, no prior professional relationship, and no legitimate interest meets none of them. The sender is in breach from the first transmission.

Under Article 82 GDPR, the recipient has a direct right to compensation for material and non-material damage. That right is assignable under Polish civil law, and almost no one ever exercises it. SpamBounty exists to close that gap.

Quantitative Exposure
Cold commercial messages per working week
Upper-bound, firstname@company.com imprint-exposed
0
Gross settlement per verified infringement
Fixed schedule, per controller
0
Remitted to the claimant
70 / 30 split on recovered compensation
0
Statutory response window
Article 15(3) GDPR, reckoned from dispatch
0 days
Governing substrate
Right to compensation · CJEU Quirin Privatbank (Sep. 2025)
Art. 82
Comparative Tableau

Your inbox, before and after the instrument fires.

Drag the Enforcement-Blue divider to compare an unaudited weekly inbox against the same inbox under SpamBounty enforcement.

III.·The Statutory Remedy

Five phases, from inbox to settlement.

Each phase produces its own record. You are notified when a phase changes, and that is all you are asked to do. No drafting, no negotiation, no litigation on your part.


IV.·Enforcement Protocol

A three-step protocol built for clean resolution.

Each step is a visible handoff. Scroll the ledger on the left and the adjacent panel shows the instrument for that step. Your involvement ends the moment you forward the email.


Legal Foundation

The Architecture of Legitimacy.

The mechanism behind the platform is the cesja wierzytelności, a Polish-law assignment of claims. It lets enforcement happen centrally and professionally, without putting any individual claimant on the record.

  • Zero Financial Risk
    Block Ventures Sp. z o.o. carries every procedural cost. You are never invoiced. No recovery means no fee.
  • Anonymity Preserved
    Because the claim is assigned outright, your name appears nowhere on the demand letter, on any public Polish e-sąd filing, or in the Portal Orzeczeń register.
  • Pan-European Jurisdiction
    Rome I and Rome II give the claim force across the 27 Member States. Cross-border recognition runs under Brussels I bis.
  • Three Independent Legal Opinions
    Every demand letter goes out with opinions from tier-one counsel in Germany, France, and Poland attached as appendices.
OLG Hamm
11 U 69/23
Jurisprudential Precedent · Oberlandesgericht Hamm

“The unauthorised transmission of electronic mail for direct marketing purposes constitutes an infringement of the general right of personality. Assignment of such claims for collective enforcement is permissible.”

Operative paragraph, judgment of 19 September 2024. Cited in the SpamBounty demand-letter annex alongside CJEU C-300/21 and CJEU C-655/23.

V·bis·Jurisprudential Corpus · Recognised Precedent

The instrument stands on settled case law.

A short index of the rulings that the SpamBounty model stands on. Every demand letter issued by Block Ventures Sp. z o.o. ships with the relevant authorities attached, in the original language and with a certified translation.

Authorities curated by the Three-Firm Legal Opinion Stack · DE / FR / PL · last revision MMXXVI · Doc. SB-COR-01

VI.·Operational Guarantees

What the platform guarantees you, in operation.

Each guarantee is written into the Terms of Service, the Deed of Assignment, and our published lawful-basis register. Each one is independently verifiable. Hover any card to isolate its clause.

Day-0 Cesja Pre-Authorisation

You authorise the assignment when you accept the Terms. At Day 31 the claim transfers automatically. You are notified, not prompted. You may revoke the pre-authorisation in writing before the audit fires.

Day 0
Cesja pre-authorised
Day 14
Art. 15 audit running
Day 31
Notification, not a decision
Codified · Terms of Service

Day-60 Automated Re-Audit

Every settled controller is re-audited 60 days after settlement. Any new unlawful email in that window is treated as a breach of the Declaration of Release. Repeat offenders are referred to UODO.

D-0Settled
D-60Re-audit
BreachUODO
Codified · Terms of Service

Article 17 Erasure Bundled

Every Article 15 access request ships with an Article 17 erasure request attached. The €150 Declaration of Release carries binding deletion obligations across the controller and its downstream processors.

Art. 15Access request
Art. 17Erasure · bundled
Codified · Terms of Service

Proportionate Escalation

Tier I is the €150 out-of-court demand. If the matter is not resolved at Tier I, Block Ventures decides how to escalate. Tier II is referral to the supervisory authority under Articles 77 and 83 GDPR, where administrative fines can reach 4% of global turnover. Tier III pools similar claims into coordinated civil proceedings. The path is chosen on the merits of each file.

Tier I€150 demand
Tier IIArt 77 referral
Tier IIIpooled action
Codified · Terms of Service

VII.·Estimated Compensation

Gross settlement per verified infringement.

We propose a fixed €150 out-of-court settlement for each verified breach against a single controller. The figure is deliberately modest. It stays inside the proportionality range for non-material damages set out by the CJEU in Quirin Privatbank (September 2025), which is what makes it hold up against frivolous-claim and abuse-of-rights defences.

This is a per-claim figure, not a forecast. We do not publish annualised recovery estimates. Every settlement is priced on its own facts.

Gross settlement
€150,00
Per verified infringement
Art. 82 GDPR · CJEU C-655/23
Remitted to claimant
70 / 30 base split · 80 / 20 at >1,000 audits · 85 / 15 at >5,000
Retained by platform
Absorbs procedural cost · no invoice to claimant
Settlement ledger
  • Gross settlement
    Per verified infringement against a single controller
    €150
  • Remitted to claimant
    70 % of recovered compensation
    €105
  • Retained by platform
    30 % · funds all procedural cost
    €45
Heavy-use claimants (>1,000 processed audits / year) transition automatically to an 80/20 share. >5,000 / year transitions to 85/15.

VIII.·Request Beta Access

Apply for early access.

Early access is limited to the first pan-European cohort. Registering here does not start any audit, and creates no obligation on you until you explicitly authorise an Article 15 request. The cesja pre-authorisation is included below and can be revoked in writing at any time before an audit is triggered.

Anti-automation challenge
[ Cloudflare Turnstile Challenge ]Widget wired in post-beta
Your submission is processed by Block Ventures Sp. z o.o., registered office in Tychy, Republic of Poland.
The cesja pre-authorisation is conditional. You may revoke it in writing at any time before an audit is formally started.
You never pay anything. The platform is funded exclusively out of recovered settlements.