spambounty
Legal background

Legal opinions

Independent opinions from counsel in Germany, France, and Poland on the GDPR framework SpamBounty relies on — Article 15 access, Article 17 erasure, Article 82 compensation. These are reference documents that explain how national courts have interpreted the framework. They are not legal advice to any individual user. We publish them here in the interests of transparency about the legal grounding of the platform.

Germany

Hengeler Mueller

v0.1.0-placeholder · 2026-04-21

Opinion forthcoming, expected Q2 2026. Once delivered by counsel, this page will carry the full reviewed opinion on the Art 15, Art 82, and Cesja chain as applied under German substantive law.

Download PDF
France

Gide Loyrette Nouel

v0.1.0-placeholder · 2026-04-21

Opinion forthcoming, expected Q2 2026. Once delivered by counsel, this page will carry the full reviewed opinion on the Art 15, Art 82, and Cesja chain as applied under French substantive law.

Download PDF
Poland

Sołtysiński Kawecki & Szlęzak

v0.1.0-placeholder · 2026-04-21

Opinion forthcoming, expected Q2 2026. Once delivered by counsel, this page will carry the full reviewed opinion on the Cesja assignment mechanism and the Art 82 GDPR claim chain under Polish civil law (Art. 509 KC).

Download PDF

These opinions are background reference material. They are not legal advice to any individual user. If you need advice tailored to your situation, consult a lawyer licensed in your jurisdiction.